HACAN has joined with Heathrow Airport to call for an Independent Noise Authority to be set up. The unkilely allies have produced a joint report with suggestions of how an Authority could work in advance of a Department of Transport consultation on the subject, expected in January. The two groups have also sent a joint letter to the Transport Secretary.
Read the report: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/IANA-Joint-Paper-HACAN-and-Heathrow-Airport1.pdf
Read the press release: http://mediacentre.heathrow.com/pressrelease/details/81/Corporate-operational-24/8054
Heathrow Airport has made a useful start in tackling noise problems over the last few years but, of course, more needs to be done. This short report from HACAN outlines the progress: http://hacan.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Heathrow-noise.pdf
Heathrow is the top mega-hub airport in Europe and 15th in the world. Nine of the top ten are in America: http://www.oag.com/hubfs/Free_Reports/Megahubs/2016/OAG-Megahubs-Index-2016.pdf
18/8/16 for immediate use
Heathrow Airport clear winner of Noise Olympics!
Heathrow was the clear winner of the Noise Olympics staged this morning by campaign group HACAN in Ravenscourt Park in Hammersmith (1). The airport received its medal, in the form of golden ear-defenders, from the local MP Andy Slaughter. The silver went to Frankfurt and the bronze to Charles De Gaulle. Gatwick trailed badly to finish in last position.
Heathrow won the race because it overflies more people than any other airport in Europe. According to European Commission figures over 725,000 residents are overflown which is 28% of all people in Europe disturbed by aircraft noise (2).
HACAN chair John Stewart said, “This was a fun way of showing that Heathrow is already in a noise league of its own. Residents are very worried what a third runway with an extra 250,000 flights a year will mean.”
Notes for Editors:
(1). The Noise Olympics.
Date: 18th August
Venue: Ravenscourt Park in Hammersmith
Event: A 100 metres race, 8 runners (representing the 7 European airports which overfly most people plus Gatwick), each wearing t-shirts
(2). The European league tables (as produced by the European Commission)
European table (top 20)
||Population within 55Lden contour
|Paris Charles de Gaulle
Gatwick is well outside the top 20 with 11,900 overflown. That would rise to a total of 37,000 if a second runway was built.
For further information:
John Stewart on 0207 737 6641 or 07957385650
8/8/16 for immediate use
MAJORITY IN PRIME MINISTER’S BACKYARD OPPOSE 3RD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW
Campaigners claim that Theresa May would run into trouble locally if she backed a third runway at Heathrow. Lobby group HACAN, which is against Heathrow expansion, has unearthed a poll which shows that less than a third of residents in Windsor and Maidenhead borough, which includes the Prime Minister’s constituency, back a third runway at Heathrow while nearly 40% oppose it. Half the people interviewed in the 2015 MORI Poll commissioned by the borough (1), back a second runway at Gatwick.
HACAN chair John Stewart said, “These findings show just how carefully the Prime Minister will have to tread in coming to her decision about where a new runway should be built. She risks a backlash in her own backyard if she gives the go-ahead to a third runway at Heathrow.”
The poll’s findings showed that 31% of people in the borough backed Heathrow Airport’s plans for a third runway, with 38% opposed to it. 50% supported a second runway at Gatwick, with 14% against.
Notes for Editors:
(1). Details of the survey
For further information:
John Stewart on 0207 737 6631 or 07957385650
2/8/16 for immediate use
A decision for a 3rd Runway would erode hard-won noise benefits for Prime Minister’s Constituency
Campaign group HACAN has claimed that a green light for a third runway would erode the benefits that the abolition of the Cranford Agreement would bring to Prime Minister’s Maidenhead constituency. The Government is expected to announce its intention to get rid of it very shortly. If it went, the number of planes landing over much of the Windsor and Maidenhead area would be halved.
For many years one of the key aims of Windsor and Maidenhead Council, backed by local residents, has been to end the Cranford Agreement (1). At present on the days when an east wind blows every single aircraft landing at Heathrow lands over the area. This is because the Cranford Agreement presents planes from taking off over Hounslow on the northern runway. If it was abolished planes landing over Berkshire could switch runways at 3pm allowing residents a half day’s break from the noise, as they currently do in West London.
HACAN chair John Stewart said, “It is deeply ironic that at the very time that the Government abolishes the Cranford Agreement to give the residents a much-deserved break from the noise, the same Government might give the go-ahead for a third runway which would erode most of the benefits.”
If the Cranford Agreement goes, residents would get an 8 hour break from the noise each day. But, if a third runway is built, that would be cut to 4 hours as the quiet period of relief would need to be shared between the runways instead of the current two.
The Government agreed to abolish the Cranford Agreement in 2008. But it became bogged down in a Public Inquiry. Hillingdon Council, the planning authority, refused Heathrow permission to build the new taxiways needed to allow planes to take-off from the northern runway. Heathrow appealed to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government who is expected to announce his decision shortly. It would be a surprise if he refused permission.
Stewart said, “Theresa May needs to be very aware that a green light for a third runway would take away many of the noise benefits her constituents have fought for over many years.”
For further information: John Stewart on 0207 737 6641 or 07957385650
A readable pamphlet from the UK Noise Association which argues that there are solutions to most noise problems, given the political will: Noise Solutions – it’s a question of political will (pdf)
15/7/16 for immediate use
Archive material reveals the extent of new Prime Minister’s opposition to a 3rd Runway at Heathrow
Campaign group HACAN has unearthed archive material which reveals that the new Prime Minister Theresa May has been a fierce opponent of a third runway at Heathrow. The information comes from material posted on the Prime Minister’s old website (1).
In response to the decision by the Labour Government to give the go-ahead to a third runway in 2009, May said:
“I know from all the letters and emails I get that many local people will be devastated by the Government’s decision. A third runway will result in thousands of additional flights, increased noise and more pollution for thousands of people. The Government’s promises on the environmental impact of this are not worth the paper they are written on – there are no planes currently on the market that would allow them to meet their noise and carbon dioxide targets. As I suspected all along, the Government paid no attention to the opinions expressed by members of the public and have decided to push ahead with expansion despite all the environmental warnings. We need a better Heathrow, not a bigger Heathrow.” https://web.archive.org/web/20130103045701/http://www.tmay.co.uk/news/111/theresa-speaks-out-against-governments-decision-to-approve-a-third-runway-at-heathrow
The archives also show that May has consistently expressed concern about night flights.
HACAN chair John Stewart said, “There must now be a real question mark over a third runway. Heathrow will argue that its proposals now offer more to residents than the 2009 plan but these archives make very clear that we have a Prime Minister who has expressed strong opposition to Heathrow expansion.”
Notes for Editors:
(1). The key links
Heathrow Airport signalled its determination to get a third runway by accepting most of the conditions set out in the Airports Commission’s report last year.
It has agreed to a legally-binding agreement ruling out a fourth runway. It is proposing to extend the length of time planes are banned during the night by one and a half hours. And it has said the use of the new runway will be limited if problems with air pollution persist.
Last July the Airports Commission, set up by the Government to look at the future of aviation, recommended a third runway should be built at Heathrow. But it made clear permission should be dependent on tough conditions being met. Today in its long-awaited response to the report Heathrow has accepted most of the key conditions in full.
Here are the details: http://mediacentre.heathrow.com/pressrelease/details/81/Expansion-News-23/6296
Immediate comment from HACAN:
Heathrow has gone further than most people expected in largely accepting the conditions set out by the Airports Commission. And, in some cases, it has gone further than the conditions. It had probably little option but to do so if it was to convince the Government to give the green light to a 3rd runway later this year. Not to have done so would have counted against it.
HACAN remains opposed to a 3rd runway. Our supporters to want a tougher night noise regime (we’ve long called for a ban on night flights before 6am) and more respite during the day but they don’t want to wait 10 years for a third runway to be built to get them.
But Heathrow’s decision to move on night flights may have implications even without a third runway. There has been stalemate on night flights for decades. HACAN has long campaigned for a ban on flights before 6am. The airlines have stoutly resisted it and some have called for more night flights. It is possible Heathrow’s proposals may prize open a door on night flights that has been firmly closed for 25 years, whether or nor not a third runway is given the green light.